Part 3: CSCOPE Misrepresented by Owner

Print Friendly

Is CSCOPE Helping or Hurting Texas Schools

Part 3: CSCOPE Misrepresented by Owner

This is part 2 of a series of articles that respond to an article by Ann Work, in TimesRecordNews, Wichita Falls, Tx. See Ms. Work’s complete article here, CSCOPE Features to Help Schools.

In the following statements from Ms. Work’s article, Poplin refers to the Director of Region 9 in Wichita Falls. Ms.

I am still searching for CSCOPE features that are helpful to schools. If you know any, please add a comment.

“Some teachers have complained about the transition, Poplin said, but CSCOPE has injected standardization, consistency, timing and rigor into classrooms all over the state just in time for STAAR, the state’s hardest test yet.”

      “Districts pay $7 per child annually, plus a technology fee, to have full access to CSCOPE.”

COMMENTS

1. I want to start with the comment about the STAAR test. How does Ms. Poplin know how hard this test is. Only students are allowed to view the test when they take the exam. Since the results of the test has not and will not be released, there is no indication if the test was hard or easy. Besides, a test being hard is very subjective. TEA never said the test would be hard. The comment was that it would be more rigorous. This set the whole state education system whirling. But, the owners of CSCOPE quickly announced that CSCOPE was the answer. Being an online material, changes could be made quickly so that the CSCOPE curriculum was always in alignment with the TEKS.  THIS IS THE TRICKY PART: The CSCOPE curriculum contains five documents that have copies of the TEKS written in different formats. The TEKS are revised every four years.

2. If it is CSCOPE curriculum that is being purchased and hailed as being standardized, why are schools paying for copies of the TEKS when they can be viewed on the TEA website for free.

3. If it is CSCOPE Instructional material that is being referred to as being standardized, consistent, timely etc…..How does Ms. Poplin know this? She and the other 19 owners of CSCOPE never had CSCOPE evaluated by an outside source. I ask a state representative about this and was told that since Ms. Poplin and the other 19 ESC directors are considered vendors, the products they produce do not have to meet any criteria. This is due to the state legislatures who must have had a bad hair day when they voted for SENATE BILL 6. This document gives school districts the right to purchase anything with our tax money.

But a new kink has been added. The superintendents and school board members must sign a document this year taking responsibility for what they purchase with Instructional Materials Allotment (IMA). OOPS! Schools with only CSCOPE and no text books are threading on thin ice with parents arm in arm with their lawyers waiting for them to come ashore. The big question is, “Why are superintendents purchasing CSCOPE when Ms. Poplin and the other 18 owners of CSCOPE loudly proclaim that CSCOPE is not for student use. In CSCOPE schools, what instructional material are students provided with?

The state is holding superintendents and school board members responsible for providing every student with INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS that cover all the elements of the TEKS adopted by the SBOE for each subject and grade.

PARENTS:
1. You cannot trust that your school district is providing a proper education for your child.

2. You cannot trust that your school district is presenting appropriate lessons. For example, a CSCOPE elementary social studies lessons has incorrect descriptions for the Bill of Rights. See this here,

CSCOPE Misrepresents the Bill of Rights.

This series is to be continued.

—————————————————–

Following is the part of Ms. Work’s article that I have not added comments to.

CSCOPE DOESN’T HAVE SPECIAL EDUCATION

This refers to Ms. Poplin.

When she began teaching in the 1970s, she worked until 2 a.m. building lesson plans for her special education students.

“It was difficult to know if I was teaching what they needed and to the rigor,” Poplin said.

A lesson is only as good as the person developing it, and a new teacher will produce something different from one with five years experience, she said.

With CSCOPE, Texas schools now have a year’s supply of ordered, constantly updated lesson plans developed by expert teachers in core subject areas, Poplin said.

John Tower Elementary Principal Stacy Darnall said she visited three first-grade classrooms one day after CSCOPE had been implemented in her school and watched one substitute and two regular teachers all teaching about spheres and congruency, using the same vocabulary but different activities. CSCOPE had provided the science of how to teach the lesson. “The art was still up to them,” she said.

CSCOPE lessons alert a teacher to problems a child might face in grasping the subject. “That one-size-all kid isn’t out there,” said Kelly Carver, Holliday’s middle school principal.

The ordered program of lessons, with the specific number of days to address each topic, prevents a teacher from elaborating for days on a favorite subject or floundering with an unfamiliar one.

Micki Wesley, Region 9 director of curriculum and instruction, said she would have been a better teacher with CSCOPE. “I never liked poetry. I’d teach it as fast as I could,” she said.

“It strengthens your weaknesses,” said Wendy Parker, a Holliday science teacher.

CSCOPE’s experts also unraveled the ambiguity of the state’s TEKS, a list of Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills that teachers were supposed to include in each lesson but that were often so murky that it was difficult to understand exactly what the state wanted.

With teachers across the state teaching the same lessons on the same timeline, a child who moves from one district to another should be within two days of catching up to his new classmates, said Coby Norman, Chillicothe ISD superintendent.

Years ago, a new student might say he was working on decimals in his former class, when his new class covered decimals months ago.

“Now we have consistency across the state, which is priceless, in my opinion,” Norman said.

Unlike a printed book or document, CSCOPE’s online lessons can be — and are — updated constantly.

“It is a living document, a growing document,” said Darnall.

“CSCOPE is the only avenue that can respond that fast,” Norman said.

Some teachers using CSCOPE realize now that they never taught to the depth their students needed.

“I was teaching for 10 years and never going anywhere near the depth. We would read Chapter 1, then I’d give a chapter 1 test,” said Holliday science teacher Wendy Parker. “After using CSCOPE for a year, students complained, ‘Your tests are so much harder!’ I’d say, ‘You’re learning so much more than you used to!'”

Teachers who pandered to their own preferences have had to learn to “stay in your own lane,” Norman said.

They may have had a favorite subject that wasn’t in their grade level, but they made it fit. “They have to develop new favorites,” he said.

Change is frustrating, and CSCOPE isn’t a cure-all for classroom discipline issues, but, like a doctor’s scope, it has shined a light on a teacher’s job — and filled her toolbox — like never before, said Micki Wesley.

“Accountability and testing have changed the education landscape,” Wesley said. “If we don’t change, our kids will be left behind.”

Share Button

Comments

  1. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate to this superb blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and
    adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
    I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about this blog
    with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  2. I am sorry to have to disagree with most of what you are saying. As a 9 year veteran, I have worked with and without cscope and I see the pros and cons. First of all, I worked in a very large district that had its own curriculum and we were still forced to be on a day to day plan and had a script. At least cscope gives me the freedom to choose the stories to use in reading and the supplements I need to use for my students. Once I signed on and learned how to use cscope, I became the teacher with 100% pass rates. My students all met the standards and they learned. I was still creative and I adapted my reading text to my cscope. My problem with your text book argument is that the latest math text is pure crap. It has errors on almost every page and does not follow our current TEKS. Websites like these hurt those of us out there busting our butts to meet expectations and give our kids what they need. I am appalled that a fellow educator would create this type of propaganda to make our jobs even harder. If you don’t like education and what the future looks like, get out!

    • Deanna,
      I do so want to correspond more with you. Obviously there
      is a lot I do not know about CSCOPE. But, I want to know any and all
      of its good points as well as its bad. I’ve not had any teachers to send
      me good points, so of course I assumed CSCOPE to be a terrible product.

      I am having a hard time with the idea that teachers have to sign a non-disclosure
      document so they will not reveal the content of CSCOPE. Now that the lessons
      are visible to the public, the contract is still binding and it can be changed at
      the discretion of CSCOPE. Plus, teachers have signed away their rights to
      any lessons they share by creating them with the CSCOPE website tools.

      But back to your comments. You say that 100% of their students pass-
      Are these CSCOPE assessments for each of the subjects you teach?
      Know that the elementary science assessment have many errors. I
      assume that you have corrected these. Teachers have identified many
      errors in the elementary CSCOPE assessments.

      I also interested in why you are so passionate about CSCOPE that you suggest
      anyone that doesn’t like CSCOPE should remove themselves from the teaching
      profession. I’ve like different instructional material but not to the point that I’d
      tell educators that didn’t like it to get out of education.

      What I think or write about CSCOPE should have no effect on you, unless you
      work for the company selling CSCOPE.

      I am truly interested in knowing why you think CSCOPE is what the future
      of education is going to be like. But even more, why are you so adamant
      about an opposing opinion.CSCOPE’s managing system and this steam
      roller attitude reminds me of documentaries of the beginning of
      Hitler’s take over of Germany.

      Please be more open minded. Since you can investigate the entire CSCOPE
      website, check out World History Unit 4b lesson 3. This reference is part
      of the material students are studying. http://www.barkati.net/english/#01

      Global Religion
      Islam is a religion for all people from whatever race or background they might be. That is why Islamic civilization is based on a unity which stands completely against any racial or ethnic discrimination. Such major racial and ethnic groups as the Arabs, Persians, Turks, Africans, Indians, Chinese and Malays in addition to numerous smaller units embraced Islam and contributed to the building of Islamic civilization. Moreover, Islam was not opposed to learning from the earlier civilizations and incorporating their science, learning, and culture into its own world view, as long as they did not oppose the principles of Islam. Each ethnic and racial group which embraced Islam made its contribution to the one Islamic civilization to which everyone belonged. The sense of brotherhood and sisterhood was so much emphasized that it overcame all local attachments to a particular tribe, race, or language–all of which became subservient to the universal brotherhood and sisterhood of Islam.
      The global civilization thus created by Islam permitted people of diverse ethnic backgrounds to work together in cultivating various arts and sciences. Although the civilization was profoundly Islamic, even non-Muslim “people of the book” participated in the intellectual activity whose fruits belonged to everyone. The scientific climate was reminiscent of the present situation in America where scientists and men and women of learning from all over the world are active in the advancement of knowledge which belongs to everyone.

    • CSCOPE Bullies Teachers and Parents
      Deanna,
      Your comment “If you don’t like education and what the future looks like, get out!”
      really bothers me.
      This is the bullying attitude I am seeing in administrators who select CSCOPE.
      It is the bullying attitude CSCOPE promotes towards teachers–strange that you
      don’t feel this. Are you a teacher or do you work for CSCOPE.

      Parents are especially bullied. But, they have rights. Check them out here.
      http://educationviews.org/cscope-trying-to-operate-under-the-radar/